Investigations/Reviews

Submission Guidelines

Introduction

In accordance with section 196F of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 ['the VEA'] the following persons and organisations may make a submission in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority):

• a veteran or a dependant of a veteran, or a member of the defence force or peacekeeping forces or a dependant of a member, who is eligible to make a claim a pension under Part II or IV of the VEA; or
• a person who is eligible to make a claim for compensation under section 319 of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 ['the MRCA']; or
• an organisation representing veterans, Australian mariners, members of the Forces, members of Peacekeeping Forces, members within the meaning of the MRCA, or their dependants; or
• a person having expertise in a field relevant to the investigation; or
• the Repatriation Commission or the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission.

A person or organisation may not make a submission on a legal matter nor be represented before the Authority by a legal practitioner.

Sound Medical-Scientific Evidence

The Authority can make a Statement of Principle about a particular kind of injury, disease or death only where there is sufficient sound medical-scientific evidence justifying the making of the Statement of Principles.

Information about a particular kind of injury, disease or death is taken to be sound medical-scientific evidence if:

1. the information:
   1. is consistent with material relating to medical science that has been published in a medical or scientific publication and has been, in the opinion of the Repatriation Medical Authority, subjected to a peer review process; or
   2. in accordance with generally accepted medical practice, would serve as the basis for the diagnosis and management of a medical condition; and
2. in the case of information about how that kind of injury, disease or death may be caused - meets the applicable criteria for assessing causation currently applied in the field of epidemiology.

Submission Material

Submissions should be structured, informative and relevant and where medical-scientific information is submitted, it would assist the Authority if:

• the review articles or authoritative reports focussed on causation; and
• the sources quoted were the result of a medical-scientific literature search concerning the causes of the particular injury, disease or death; and
• the material quoted or referred to must be footnoted; and
• the abstracts of relevant material should be attached to the submission.

Standard textbooks or general reviews in respected medical journals, when unreferenced, will be taken as unsubstantiated opinions.

Where literature searches of Medline or other medical databases are conducted, it would assist the Authority if searches of those databases are undertaken for English language publications written during the past six years about the causes of the particular injury, disease or death.

If a literature search is undertaken, the search process used and the search criteria applied should be include in the submission.

Evaluation Of Material By The Authority

The Authority can make a Statement of Principle about a particular kind of injury, disease or death only where there is sufficient sound medical-scientific evidence justifying the making of the Statement of Principles.

If the Authority has previously decided not to make a Statement of Principles, or has already made a Statement of Principles, in respect of the particular condition, it may only make a new Statement of Principles if it thinks there is a new body of sound medical-scientific evidence that, together with the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered, justifies the making or amendment of a Statement of Principles.

The Authority is required to assess all material against certain epidemiological criteria. The criteria set out below are not exhaustive and may not be relevant in all cases. They are provided as a guide to the material that is acceptable to the Authority.

Information may assist the Authority if it is contained in studies that:

• are well designed
• give enough information
• are not merely hypothesis generating exercises from large databases
• have adequate outcome measurements
• have no other faults in methodology

Assessing Combined Epidemiological Evidence

The material that you intend to submit in support of your case should be closely examined against these criteria:

• Strength of association;
• Consistency;
• Specificity;
• Temporality;
• Biological gradient;
• Plausibility;
• Experimental evidence;
• Analogy

When evaluating against competing hypotheses the Authority will use the above criteria as well as the coherence of the information. You may wish to refer the Authority to a relevant meta-analysis, or the Authority may use an existing such analysis or have one commissioned.

Suggested Format

The Authority suggests that the following format be followed for submissions:

• Begin by stating the purpose of the submission.  List the factors that you think cause (or do not cause) the condition.
• Describe any literature search you may have conducted.
• Discuss these various factors in the order in which you have listed them in the introduction.  Footnote all medical-scientific material that you refer to or discuss.
• If you have referred to sound medical-scientific evidence in the submission, attach an Appendix of References. This attachment should contain abstracts of the articles and other references that you have referred to in your submission.

Download the Request for an Investigation/Review form
(PDF format, 186k).

This page last updated 22 April 2007.